However i got these information according to my reading
The survey info as follows
1) You must have been livid (as an artist) when Apple changed its screen size to mimic the Samsung size? or when it changed it's interface last year to move towards the android set up? Did you also know that the chips inside your artistic Iphone are made by Samsung?
Well I guess as humans, we all learn from one another! The difference is, Apple pays for those chips, they don't just walk into a Samsung store and steal them in plain sight.
2)
I know its not just megapixels, but Apple is still behind on this being meagpixels are what take in the light and create the destiny of the picture.
Sony as referenced has 20.7mp, but wide-angle G-Lens and a very good apeture too.
iPhone 6 definitely has a good apeture and lens system, but pixel destiny on the final product (printed or TV picture) is still less.
Thats not because I don't see the benefit of faster processors (I couldn't live with a slow computer) or multi screen apps (if thats what you really want) but because my iPhone does everything I need it to do and it does it quickly.
Apple isn't holding people back, and if they skip the faster processor this year its only going to be another 12 months before the next phone comes, and to be fair, nobody is suffering because the software is made in house and is optimised to utilise every last micron.
These phone wars are pointless and downright pathetic when you consider the real issues in the world, but being an artist, it does truly piss me off when Samsung can't innovate with their own designs.
4) My Mother's 6 Plus is going through the same lag issues. I noticed them this weekend because my Mother wanted me to take pics of my kids with her phone. When I noticed the lag I rebooted the phone to see if it would remedy it, but the issue was still present. It was so noticeable. I was taken back really.
5) Surprise, the complex/versatile Android that runs on thousands of different devices is more stable than iOS on a handful of devices
6) Lol @phonearena :)) this is a funny test! :)) 2014 8 mpx camera vs 2015 16 mpx camera :))))) come on -_-
7) Apples operating systems generally break down and need a refit, Apples phones are easily damaged and Apple place so many restrictions on how music and video files can be played or shared. Samsung specs do work, and they do out perform apple consistently.
8) from russian language translated through google translation
Many errors in the performance of both devices.
Many errors in the performance of both devices.
1. Do you really think that the iPhone weighs 113 grams? Ofitsiany his weight - 129 grams.
2. Why is the density of pixels per inch at S6 - 534 ppi ?, and the iPhone 6 - 416? In S6 - 557ppi, ay iPhone 6 - 326ppi (y iPhone 6 plus - 421ppi)
3. Samsung 4 processor with 2.1 gHz and 4 to 1.5 gHz. If we find them gathered the arithmetic mean, it is 1.8, not 2 as you.
9) I got this impression was that aforementioned heavy use of glass in the S6. It just feels like it's a moderate drop away from a wince-inducing shattering incident, front and back.
In actual fact the glass is relatively tough, but it serves to make the whole handset more vulnerable thanks to its unique properties. Quite simply, the Galaxy S6 is extremely slippery.
Still, there's no doubting that by most meaningful metrics, the Galaxy S6 screen is better. In fact, we'd say it's the best smartphone screen on the market.
Finally,the Galaxy S6 is undoubtedly the more powerful device in purely technical terms. Its Exynos 7420 CPU is an octa-core (in effect two quad-cores) chip clocked at 1.5GHz. That compares favourably to the iPhone 6's A8 chip, which is a dual-core 1.4GHz example. The S6 also has three times the RAM of the iPhone 6 at 3GB.
Of course, Apple's custom approach to processor tech yields results that frequently exceed the best that the Android crowd can manage with their off-the shelf parts. That's particularly the case with single-core performance, which still plays an important role in most smartphone tasks.
However, Samsung has also gone the custom route with the S6's chip, and it's produced a stunner. In my Geekbench 3 benchmark tests, the iPhone 6 was only slightly faster in single core terms (scoring just 100 points higher on average), while the S6 was massively faster in multi-core terms (2300 more on average).
This is actually pretty meaningless, though, thanks to the vastly different operating systems each runs. Android and iOS utilise processors and memory resources in completely different ways.
In practical terms, then, both phones are as fast as they get for their respective platforms - and that's all that you really need to know when making a decision between the two.
9) I got this impression was that aforementioned heavy use of glass in the S6. It just feels like it's a moderate drop away from a wince-inducing shattering incident, front and back.
In actual fact the glass is relatively tough, but it serves to make the whole handset more vulnerable thanks to its unique properties. Quite simply, the Galaxy S6 is extremely slippery.
Still, there's no doubting that by most meaningful metrics, the Galaxy S6 screen is better. In fact, we'd say it's the best smartphone screen on the market.
Finally,the Galaxy S6 is undoubtedly the more powerful device in purely technical terms. Its Exynos 7420 CPU is an octa-core (in effect two quad-cores) chip clocked at 1.5GHz. That compares favourably to the iPhone 6's A8 chip, which is a dual-core 1.4GHz example. The S6 also has three times the RAM of the iPhone 6 at 3GB.
Of course, Apple's custom approach to processor tech yields results that frequently exceed the best that the Android crowd can manage with their off-the shelf parts. That's particularly the case with single-core performance, which still plays an important role in most smartphone tasks.
However, Samsung has also gone the custom route with the S6's chip, and it's produced a stunner. In my Geekbench 3 benchmark tests, the iPhone 6 was only slightly faster in single core terms (scoring just 100 points higher on average), while the S6 was massively faster in multi-core terms (2300 more on average).
This is actually pretty meaningless, though, thanks to the vastly different operating systems each runs. Android and iOS utilise processors and memory resources in completely different ways.
In practical terms, then, both phones are as fast as they get for their respective platforms - and that's all that you really need to know when making a decision between the two.
1) Samsung Galaxy S6
Exynos 7420 64-bit octa-core, Mali T760 GPU, 3GB RAM
S6 Samsung opted against using the Snapdragon 810 processor found inside the LG Flex 2 and HTC One M9 in favour for its custom chip. The 64-bit Exynos 7420 chip offers a very similar octa-core set-up to the aforementioned Snapdragon 810 and delivers a slick, overall performance
iPhone 6
Apple A8 64-bit dual-core 1.4GHz, PowerVR GX6450 GPU, 1GB RAM
The iPhone 6 features Apple’s punchy A8 CPU, a dual-core 64-bit chip with a seriously swift GPU attached and backed by 1GB of RAM. This is a different approach to that taken by Android chip makers, who typically go for a quad-core GPU and at least 2GB of RAM.
2) Samsung Galaxy S6 features 3GB of RAM - that’s three times the amount found in the iPhone 6. More important here, however, is the speed of that RAM. The Galaxy S6 is the first phone to feature DDR4 memory, which is 80 percent faster than the iPhone 6's DDR3.
3) Geekbench 3 multi-core scores
Samsung Galaxy S6 - 4116
iPhone 6 - 2933
No comments:
Post a Comment